Two executives criticized Ms. Jones’s approach, according to three people today who had been at the assembly and were not licensed to explore it publicly. In unique, Susan Plagemann, the main enterprise officer of Condé Nast’s fashion division, challenged Ms. Jones at size, indicating the strategy would be complicated to market to advertisers. To defuse the rigidity, Ms. Wintour banged her fist on the desk, declaring, “We have to have to move on,” according to the 3 folks who have been at the meeting.
Ms. Plagemann, who is white, joined the company in 2010 as Vogue’s chief company officer and worked intently with Ms. Wintour in 2018, she was elevated to her present-day occupation. 3 folks with knowledge of the make any difference mentioned she was vocal about her detrimental view of Self-importance Good below its new editor.
She had criticized Ms. Jones’s options of protect subjects, telling others at the company that the magazine ought to attribute “more men and women who glance like us,” two of the persons stated. A third individual claimed he had read her use terms expressing a very similar sentiment. All the people mentioned they interpreted the phrase and comparable remarks as referring to very well-off white females who adopt an aesthetic widespread amid the trend set.
By way of a Condé Nast spokesman, Ms. Plagemann denied building those people statements and denied expressing a dim check out of Ms. Jones’s Vanity Fair.
In the interview on Friday, Mr. Lynch dealt with Ms. Jones’s stewardship of the magazine extra broadly. “The problem with her using that new direction would be alienating some of the classic Vainness Honest viewers,” he said. “I seriously applaud what she’s carried out.”
The rebellion at Condé Nast was overdue, some workers users explained. “We’ve been asking for alter for months now,” Sohla El-Waylly, an assistant editor at Bon Appétit, explained in an interview.
In the Tuesday conference with Bon Appétit staff members associates, Mr. Lynch reported he hoped to confirm a determination to range with the decision of Mr. Rapoport’s alternative. Afterwards in the call, he recommended that some personnel users preferred to damage Bon Appétit economically to convey about modify, a comment that irked some in the conference.